The prospect of playing with, cuddling or even bottle-feeding lion cubs is an attractive draw for many travelers to Africa. However, few tourists realize the devastating consequences of such experiences.
After long years of conservationists campaigning against such hands-on wildlife interactions, the South African government has taken a stance. In a 2018 report titled “Captive Lion Breeding for Hunting in South Africa: Harming or Promoting the Conservation Image of the Country,” the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Environment Affairs called for a ban on captive lion breeding.
The travel industry in Africa has also tried to steer travelers away from questionable experiences while at the same time satisfying the growing demand for more active wildlife activities.
Sean Kritzinger, executive chairman of Giltedge Africa, said the South African tourism industry received an incredible amount of backlash concerning hands-on animal interactions. He added that despite this backlash, there’s still a demand for seeing Africa’s wild animals up close and personal.
“There is something incredible and indescribable about seeing animals in the wild, so we promote the authentic wildlife experience to our clients. Southern and East Africa have such an abundance of reserves and national parks,” Kritzinger said. “There are plenty of experiences that allow clients a more personal interaction with wild animals which are fair trade approved or sustainable.”
Jim Holden, president of Holden Safaris, agreed, saying that while the public is being conditioned that it’s not acceptable to touch wild animals, people on safari are encouraged to assist with conservation activities, such as the dehorning rhinos, contraception of elephants and the relocation of wildlife.
“Under the name of conservation, as opposed to entertainment, interaction with wildlife is OK, and one is seeing offerings of more such safaris,” he said.
Joss Kent, CEO of AndBeyond, explained that participative conservation experiences are strongly emerging as his company and others break down the barriers to what happens behind the scenes. Kent said that although AndBeyond’s Impact Journeys involve animal interaction, these trips are created for research purposes, as well, to create a better life in the wild for the animals.
Captured in Africa’s Paul Tully said the increase in demand for “conservation safaris” has pros and cons, “the positive being the benefits to the animals and/or organization offering such activities as rhino notching [cutting an ear for identification] or lion collaring.”
“The negative is that these activities don’t need to happen that often,” Tully said, “so it’s dangerous to create a demand for these activities that may see unnecessary notching or collaring exercises that only place pressure and stress on the animals.”
Tully added that the demand has migrated toward natural, escape-from-the-crowds safaris where travelers can view animals in their natural habitat.
Holden agreed that in many ways the African lodges’ newer offerings actually consist of getting back to the safaris of old, putting the emphasis on skilled guides to do meaningful game walks and game tracking and spending a day with local people to better understand their culture.
“All in all, we see more education and less simple observation or passive safari,” he said.
Industry experts have shared a few safari experiences that don’t put wild animals at risk: